CO129-399 - Governor Sir May - 1913 [1-2] — Page 264

}

UNDEN HÀ SIMU a m. sludsin joo

OP Y.

Enclosure

3

C.O.

5615

262

REC?

DA

...

30 BOR, DA

en nú va,kit

DJ Jnonitisq

}

i .16: HOTMAS Bi.. reviz

Lake And More of sig tilge Job ti ealm) to educ ton

mym polu do #iodesjugtey OLD

O JIT

sound,seinglow To.. no balut

.Toval nieud nÌ QVI (B) RUJTOO

» ja mavi, ni aaouong ai... To si o to EDQ.AT MS „beebr1"

.nse Ino boJELS İnpili s1 :

(4-1 . ‚OQUI .0.2.1

Quibusbong Bi

de toit

INTRO

116 di mans1976 307 9 3w? I (0_VI) (42 duikow .V tel ni odNG BJB MIN HO Baso Li180

wolfeo? mi snob motto tui auzi 20s honog a loinw ni 106 9.2 empat Jon Bugou 3.38u8n and lo dito ou end beaut. DIE 19, VIJNM00 GMC ni addİ MÜD BLATO B vid don bleus JTUOV *.beaute sur Line pade

LAT 91 I

06

'

.0001 22 .dum - dway Inno.". Fill ofrada)

.You .yad . .J) [I

8991 bed aromah daii n

emm ortol ed♪ ddir swot (a no inner v od 02 3988 6230 cin

1.

Additional Memorandum relative to the second application

for the extradition of Vicente Sotto.

Since writing my minute of the 1st. December, 1912, I have had the advantage of perusing the memorandum prepared by Mr. Welch (

Assistant Secretary for the Philippine Islands) relative to the law

and practice in the United States in regard to a second arrest in con-

-nection with an extradition: and I have also had my attention called

to a recent case reported in the Times Law Reports of 9th. August, 1912,,

(Rex v. Governor of Brixton Prison: ex parte Stallmann).

2. It seems clear that in the United States the practice shows a

very strong inclination not to allow any failure due to a technical

mistake on a first application for extradition to interfere with the

surrender upon a second or subsequent application: The English case

quoted also indicates that a line has been laid down now in England on which it may be assumed that a merely technical error which enabled a person against whom an Order for extradition is being sought to obtain his discharge on custody need not necessarily prevent a second applica- -tion being made for such person's extradition on the same charge. 3. The case, which is quoted in Stallmann's case, which was particularly in my mind when expressing my view on the purely legal aspect of Sotto's case was that of the Attorney General of Hongkong versus Kwok A Sing (L.R. 5. P.C. 179). The circumstances surrounding Sotto's case are as may be seen from the judgment of the Kembers of the Hongkong Full Court on his application for Habeas Corpus (reported in the Hongkong Law Reports Volume VII Part 1 Page 139) of an unusual

character.

(Sd.) John A. Bucknill,

A.C.

and ghini ajmoo mawlov sul dia yan hlou Imoinuloro al

mi nus ("noiciueb e a ni bacio noriu tak dan) boJoup ovove anoinioweb

Deinodol and to Incognit

.ovisioob ed od Ba

2nd. January, 1913.

Jo Items Doug

!

* GIS DOINеB004 W

.5#ao Bird to nebo;wg elo ni Jintaan vol

HOJEW YOLO RAMONT (.18)

„bed& Inulin (LATTusq TO

M... ...?i ouiqqİLLİ